LIVE · MCP Conformance Control Plane · spec engines online Last updated 2026-09-06
◉ MONITORING · STDIO · TOOLS/LIST · AUTHORIZATION · TOOLS/CALL ◉ SPEC TARGET · MCP 07-28-2026
MCP · MODEL CONTEXT PROTOCOL · SPEC TARGET · 07-28-2026
07
Month
28
Day
20
Year
26
Spec
Spec target · MCP 07-28-2026 · assess your implementation against the target. Free patch first; scoped remediation only where needed.

The MCP conformance control plane

Know the target.
Patch your MCP.
Prove it works.

One conformance control plane. Modular MCP spec engines. Hot target: MCP 07-28-2026. Know where your implementation stands — before it drifts out of spec.

PrestigeMCP is MCP-specific execution: inventory, applicability against the current spec, installed controls, tested evidence, and higher-tier monitoring. Connected to DeadlineSF rule intelligence — not a one-off checklist.

How we earn the right to help

We don't ask for trust. We prove it — with a free fix you can use today. The patch is the pitch. Help first. Always.

Take the gift →

Gift first

Free MCP patch
Proof before invoice

Spec-backed

Current MCP spec
Verified at engagement

Deliverable

07-28-2026 findings
Evidence where generated

Coverage

Auth · transport
Discovery · tokens

01Why 07-28-2026 matters

The protocol surface moves.

MCP is an evolving specification. As the protocol surface and its authorization requirements change, an implementation that conformed last quarter can drift out of conformance without any change to your own code.

The 07-28-2026 target is the reference point this offer is calibrated to. The work is about implementation readiness — not alarm: confirming that authorization behavior, transport and state handling, request metadata handling, discovery, and token validation match the requirements that actually apply to your deployment.

Scope is your MCP implementation and its conformance posture. High-level engineering offer, not legal advice.

02What we check

A conformance grid, honestly labeled.

Each check is tagged so you always know whether it comes from the protocol, from common industry practice, or from PrestigeSF's own defensive posture. We do not present defensive policy as a protocol mandate.

SPEC_MANDATE — required by the MCP spec INDUSTRY_STANDARD — accepted practice DEFENSIVE_POLICY — PrestigeSF hardening, not a mandate
MCP authorization behaviorSpec
Insufficient-scope / scope step-up handlingSpec
DCR application_type handling (where DCR is used)Spec
Transport / state-boundary behaviorSpec
Request metadata (_meta) handlingIndustry
Server discovery behaviorSpec
Token validation where applicableSpec
Implementation gaps against the 07-28-2026 targetAssessment
Tool-poisoning / metadata-injection sanitizationDefensive
Runtime leakage boundary across MCP endpointsDefensive

Categorization reflects our assessment framework and is verified against the current MCP specification at engagement time. Where the spec is silent, an item is labeled Industry or Defensive — never Spec.

03The free MCP patch

The front door is free.

Start with a free, inspect-before-connect MCP patch. It runs against your own server so you can see where you stand before any conversation about paid work. The patch is the proof, not the pitch.

  1. Free entry point. No invoice, no commitment. The patch is yours to run and keep.
  2. Inspect before connect. You inspect your MCP surface locally, on infrastructure you already control.
  3. What you receive. A runnable snippet plus a plain read on how your implementation lines up with the 07-28-2026 target.
  4. If issues are found. Only then does a scoped, priced engagement make sense — assessment, then remediation where it is actually warranted.

What is required

  • Your own MCP server / endpoint to run the patch against
  • The ability to run a snippet in your environment

What is NOT required

  • No access to your stack, keys, or production systems
  • No data handed over to start
  • No purchase to use the free patch

04MCP 07-28-2026 findings

What an assessment returns.

After a scoped assessment, you receive a structured read of where your MCP implementation stands. Deliverables depend on your deployment and are confirmed at engagement — we do not promise evidence an assessment does not actually generate.

Applicable findings

The items that actually apply to your deployment, tagged Spec / Industry / Defensive.

Passed controls

What already conforms — recorded, not just what is broken.

Remediation priorities

Ordered by exposure against the 07-28-2026 target, not by list order.

Evidence

Supporting evidence for findings where the assessment produces it.

Deployment recommendation

A clear go / fix-first read for the implementation as assessed.

Implementation roadmap

The scoped path from current state to conformance.

Where appropriate, output can align to the standardized DeadlineSF AI Trust Report format so MCP findings sit alongside your broader rule posture.

05Remediation

From gap to fix.

Identifying the gap is half the job. PrestigeSF can move from the finding to the applicable implementation fix — scoped and concrete, verified after the change.

  1. Authorization-flow remediation — bring auth and scope step-up behavior into line with the target.
  2. Request / state handling fixes — correct transport and state-boundary behavior.
  3. DCR corrections where applicable — application_type and dynamic client registration handling.
  4. Policy / control implementation — install the defensive controls you choose to adopt, clearly marked as policy.
  5. Verification after remediation — re-check the fixed surface so the change is provable, not assumed.

06Monitoring

Requirements keep moving.

MCP requirements continue to evolve. Optional ongoing monitoring watches for material MCP changes and future DeadlineSF law-pack / spec updates, so a conformant implementation stays that way.

Monitoring is optional. You never have to buy monitoring to use the free patch.

07DeadlineSF connection

MCP-specific execution.
DeadlineSF rule intelligence.

PrestigeMCP

Handles the MCP-specific customer engagement — the free patch, assessment, remediation, and implementation against the 07-28-2026 target.

DeadlineSF

Tracks and structures the underlying rule and spec surface. Powered by DeadlineSF rule intelligence for current MCP rule and requirement tracking.

Two distinct PrestigeSF products, one control plane. PrestigeMCP does not replace DeadlineSF, and DeadlineSF is not merged into PrestigeMCP.

08Packages & engagement

Free patch first. Priced only where needed.

The free patch is the front door and stays free. Paid work is scoped to what the assessment actually finds.

Base
$500/mo
Pro
$1,500/mo
Retainer
$2,500/mo

Front door

Free MCP patchFree$0

Assessment

Catalog audit$750
Intake + applicability$3,500

Remediation / implementation

Disclosure / provenance install$7,500

Rush / priority

Full package (rush)$12,500

Monitoring

Ongoing MCP + rule monitoring$500–$1,500/mo

Enterprise MCP retainer

MCP Conformance & Hardening Retainer

$2,500 / month

Ongoing conformance · cancel anytime

  • Continuous conformance tracking across active MCP server endpoints
  • Authorization, transport, and discovery behavior kept aligned to spec
  • Tool-poisoning / metadata-injection sanitization (defensive policy)
  • Runtime leakage boundary across MCP endpoints (defensive policy)
  • Rule + spec updates via DeadlineSF rule intelligence

Sample · verified MCP conformance receipt

PRESTIGE-MCP · CONFORMANCE RECEIPT · SAMPLE
target        : MCP 07-28-2026
scope         : your MCP implementation
authorization : PASS
scope step-up : PASS
transport     : PASS
discovery     : review — see findings
evidence      : attached where generated
status        : illustrative sample only

Prices shown are the existing PrestigeMCP prices — nothing here is newly invented. Sample receipt is illustrative. High-level product only — not legal advice. Sister site to DeadlineSF.net.

MCP 07-28-2026

Start with the free patch.